header-logo header-logo

19 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Commons debates further amendments to Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

MPs debated further amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill on 18 January 2023 as it returned to the House of Commons for its remaining Commons stages.

Lexis®Library update: Among the amendments under consideration were a number of technical amendments proposed by the government, an opposition amendment with cross-party support requiring the Secretary of State to produce an exhaustive list of all legislation to be revoked under the sunset provision at least three months before the sunset deadline specified in the Bill, and to allow that list to be amended by Parliament, plus a number of amendments relating to protection of workers’ rights and environmental protections. Extension of the sunset deadline to 2026, as well as provisions excluding legislation within devolved competence from the sunset, were also among the amendments debated. At the time of publication the debate was ongoing. Further details to follow.

John Bell, LLM, former Schuman Trainee at the European Parliament, has commented on the debate.

To view the tabled amendments, see: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper) and Speaker’s provisional grouping and selection of Amendments.

To view the Commons transcript, see: Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023.

John Bell has commented:

'As it concludes its remaining stages in the Commons, the REULRR Bill continues to raise issues of legal certainty. The sunset clause would create a cliff edge bonfire of thousands of items of Retained EU Law at the end of 2023 with no provision for consultation.

As confirmed by the front bench, the number of REUL on the Cabinet Office Dashboard is unknown, placing practitioners and stakeholders in unchartered waters. This is a concern since thousands of items of REUL potentially captured by the sunset clause cover EU-derived environmental, food safety, product safety, and employment rights.

The REULRR Bill contains extensive use of Henry VIII powers, taking back control to Government rather than Parliament 6 years on from the Brexit referendum. Faced with this democratic deficit, it will likely fall on the unelected House of Lords to bring a modicum of legal certainty to this deeply flawed Bill.’

For further updates via Bill Tracker, see: LNB News 23/09/2022 11.

Sources:

• Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023

• Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill - Parliamentary Bills - UK Parliament

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 18 January 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll