header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Commons debates further amendments to Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

19 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail
MPs debated further amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill on 18 January 2023 as it returned to the House of Commons for its remaining Commons stages.

Lexis®Library update: Among the amendments under consideration were a number of technical amendments proposed by the government, an opposition amendment with cross-party support requiring the Secretary of State to produce an exhaustive list of all legislation to be revoked under the sunset provision at least three months before the sunset deadline specified in the Bill, and to allow that list to be amended by Parliament, plus a number of amendments relating to protection of workers’ rights and environmental protections. Extension of the sunset deadline to 2026, as well as provisions excluding legislation within devolved competence from the sunset, were also among the amendments debated. At the time of publication the debate was ongoing. Further details to follow.

John Bell, LLM, former Schuman Trainee at the European Parliament, has commented on the debate.

To view the tabled amendments, see: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper) and Speaker’s provisional grouping and selection of Amendments.

To view the Commons transcript, see: Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023.

John Bell has commented:

'As it concludes its remaining stages in the Commons, the REULRR Bill continues to raise issues of legal certainty. The sunset clause would create a cliff edge bonfire of thousands of items of Retained EU Law at the end of 2023 with no provision for consultation.

As confirmed by the front bench, the number of REUL on the Cabinet Office Dashboard is unknown, placing practitioners and stakeholders in unchartered waters. This is a concern since thousands of items of REUL potentially captured by the sunset clause cover EU-derived environmental, food safety, product safety, and employment rights.

The REULRR Bill contains extensive use of Henry VIII powers, taking back control to Government rather than Parliament 6 years on from the Brexit referendum. Faced with this democratic deficit, it will likely fall on the unelected House of Lords to bring a modicum of legal certainty to this deeply flawed Bill.’

For further updates via Bill Tracker, see: LNB News 23/09/2022 11.

Sources:

• Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023

• Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill - Parliamentary Bills - UK Parliament

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 18 January 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll