header-logo header-logo

LLPs await tax liability rise

07 January 2014
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Salary & equity partners to be impacted by changes to the status of LLP members

Changes to the status of LLP members this year will have “significant” financial consequences for salary and equity partners but there could be an upside, say tax experts. 

HMRC’s partnership tax reform for LLPs is due to come into effect on 6 April 2014, from when many junior, salaried or even equity partners in LLPs will be treated as employees, depending on their share of profits, influence and investment of own capital in the business. 

Dominic Vincent, insolvency partner at Weightmans LLP, says the proposed reform is “an unwelcome reminder to professional practices that despite their best laid plans unexpected financial pressures can still arise in the most efficiently run businesses”.

However, Peter Noyce, head of professional services at accountants Menzies LLP, says: “Re-classifying fixed equity, and perhaps even full equity, partners as employees would add considerably to national insurance costs, but there is a bigger picture to consider.

“Since the introduction of alternative business structures and resultant influx of well capitalised new entrants to the legal services market, the gearing of law firms has become a problem and made it harder for them to compete. However, under the government’s proposals a partner in an LLP will not be deemed as employed if their capital contribution is more than 25% of their expected profit share.

“In the months leading up to 5 April 2014, many partners will choose to inject capital into the LLP to protect their self-employed status. This would immediately give firms a more robust capital base, a stronger balance sheet and improved working capital.

“The proposed tax changes offer a second potential benefit for law firm finances. One of the criteria for avoiding employed status is that partner remuneration should depend on the firm’s profits. This requirement may encourage a more prudent approach to drawings.”

Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll