header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Liverpool FC saga

The US owners of the Boston Red Sox finally signed a deal to buy Liverpool FC last week after a legal stand-off. The £300m deal will allow the club to pay back its debts to RBS, its main creditor.

The US owners of the Boston Red Sox finally signed a deal to buy Liverpool FC last week after a legal stand-off. The £300m deal will allow the club to pay back its debts to RBS, its main creditor.

Tom Hicks and George Gillett, the club’s previous owners, claim the club’s value is closer to £600m and tried to stop the sale by replacing board members. When RBS obtained an injunction in the High Court to prevent this, the pair obtained an injunctive action from a Texas court. RBS then secured a declaration from Mr Justice Floyd that the Texas proceedings had no locus standi. Hicks and Gillett withdrew the Texas order the following day.
However, Hicks and Gillett are reported to be considering bringing a claim in damages for up to £1.6bn.

Andrew Nixon, associate, Thomas Eggar Sports Group, says: “Hicks and Gillett will seek to argue that the board failed to discharge its fiduciary duties to the shareholders by apparently refusing to look at other bids for the football club. They will also claim that the deal undervalues the asset, and by selling for £300m fails to secure the best possible price. To succeed, Hicks and Gillett will not only have to show that the board acted with blinkers but that the club is worth significantly more than £300m. Read more @ www.newlawjournal.co.uk

Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll