header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Life in Court: some practical guidance

Janna Purdie on how practitioners can make life easier for themselves in front of the judiciary

Court etiquette - Jacobs v Skidmore Owings [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)

All practitioners will have encountered difficulties in providing sensible time estimates to the courts for hearings. However, just because it can be difficult or the estimate fluctuates over time does not mean that the requirement to inform the court can be ignored.
While failures to advise the court of changes to time estimates may come from a fear that the court will adjourn the application, this sort of behaviour disrupts the rest of the court service and is discourteous. Judges will invariably try to accommodate applications which have been listed.
In Jacobs v Skidmore, the time estimate of two hours, when the application took three days, was obviously inadequate and was criticised by Mr Justice Coulson. While the judge acknowledged that it is sometimes difficult for parties to agree a reasonable time estimate at the time of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll