header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Life changing decisions

Julian Samiloff reflects on the battle for and against assisted suicide

Debbie Purdy has multiple sclerosis. As the disease progresses life may become so unbearable that she may wish to end her life. She fears that eventually the disease will rob her of the physical ability to do the act herself so that if she chooses suicide she will require assistance. However, assisted suicide is a criminal offence (Suicide Act 1961 (SA 1961), s 2(1)(4)) so that if anyone was to help her in any way they would risk liability and imprisonment; even helping Debbie Purdy to travel to a Swiss clinic where she would get lawful assistance to die would expose helpers to that liability, and, contemplating imprisonment for her husband was not an option for her.

Pretty
In a similar case, R (Pretty) v DPP (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2001] UKHL 61, [2002] 1 All ER 1, Diane Pretty claimed that if SA 1961, s 2 prevented her assisted suicide or the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) undertaking not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll