header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Life at the employed Bar

Employed barristers have higher levels of wellbeing, are more diverse and enjoy greater flexibility and work/life balance than the self-employed Bar, the Bar Council has found.

However, it also discovered the employed Bar experiences bullying and harassment at similar levels to the whole Bar, has far fewer King’s Counsel, and is concerned about career progression and income. 

Of the 17,000 barristers currently in practice, more than 3,000 (18%) are employed. The Bar Council report, ‘Life at the employed Bar’, published last week, is based on analysis of data on the demographics and working lives of employed barristers as well as focus group discussions, and makes nine recommendations.

Stuart Alford KC, chair of the Bar Council employed barristers’ committee, said: ‘The recommendations we’re adopting provide a clear steer on things we must improve: better information about the benefits of a career at the employed Bar, targeted support on career progression—particularly when it comes to judicial appointments for employed barristers, a greater focus on tackling bullying and harassment within the employed arm of profession, and support in developing networks for employed barristers throughout England & Wales.’

The report paints a picture of employed barristers’ working lives. More than half work in the public sector and nearly a quarter work in legal firms. The main areas are crime (34%), commercial and financial services (14%) and public law (13%).

The employed Bar is more diverse, with women making up 49% (compared to 37% of the self-employed Bar) and nearly one in five from an ethnic minority background (compared to 15% of the self-employed Bar).

Only 52 employed barristers (2.6%) are King’s Counsel.

The vast majority, 86%, report a sense of collaboration and co-operation in their workplace. However, 31% have personally experienced bullying, discrimination or harassment at work. Women, people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and those who work in solicitors’ firms are more likely to have been subjected to this.

Nick Vinneal KC, Bar Council chair, said: ‘This report provides a clear way forward for the Bar Council, working with others, to promote, champion, and support employed barristers as members of our One Bar.’

Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll