header-logo header-logo

29 September 2021
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Life at the Bar can be grim

Nearly one in three barristers (30%) have reported being bullied, harassed and/or discriminated against at work within the previous two years, research has found

The Bar Council’s 2021 Working Lives Survey, published this week, uncovered the devastating figure, up from 21% in the last survey, in 2017.

In response to the findings, the Bar Council said tackling bullying, harassment and discrimination would continue to be a priority. It has set up an anonymous reporting app Talk to Spot, is working with the senior judiciary to stamp out judicial bullying of barristers and published a Bar Council Guide on judicial bullying in 2019.

Nearly two-thirds (63%) reported the pandemic has had a negative impact on their practice, with criminal barristers faring worst overall (79%). On new ways of working post-pandemic, the majority want to work in a different way―only 23% opposed change. Of those in favour of change, 60% want more remote working and 42% want more flexible working patterns.

The Bar Council is currently drawing up a flexible working guide for the Bar.

Government plans to shrink the backlog through Extended Operating Hours in courts found little favour with barristers― only 9% approved.

Derek Sweeting QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘Work has already begun in the last year or so to tackle the issue of bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar, and we are making the Bar a more accessible profession in terms of its working practices.

‘The Bar Council’s Modernising the Bar programme lies at the heart of this effort.’

The Modernising the Bar programme focuses on women and under-represented groups, aiming to: make distribution of work fairer, including briefing practices, marketing opportunities and monitoring; and improve practice management, including supporting new and returning barristers and supporting progression.

Some 3,479 barristers responded to the survey.

Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll