header-logo header-logo

07 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Libor convictions boost the SFO

Three former Barclays traders have been convicted of Libor fraud—results that will “buoy up” the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) even though questions remain, a senior business fraud solicitor has said.

A jury at Southwark Crown Court found Jonathan Mathew, Jay Merchant and Alex Pabon guilty of conspiracy to defraud in connection with an SFO investigation into the manipulation of US Dollar Libor (the London Interbank Offered Rate) between June 2005 and September 2007. The verdict followed an 11-week trial. Two co-defendants were cleared.

Another man, Peter Johnson, pleaded guilty in October 2014, and in August 2015, former UBS and Citigroup trader Tom Hayes was found guilty of manipulating Libor. That makes five convictions out of 19 individuals charged following the SFO investigation. A further six individuals await trial for the alleged manipulation of EURIBOR on 4 September 2017.

David Corker, partner at Corker Binning, said: “These results will buoy up the SFO but they were desperately needed to save its reputation after the not guilty verdicts in the second Libor trial. Questions do remain though about the way in which the Libor prosecutions were brought after loud political pressure.

“They were about conduct widely condoned or encouraged at the time in a broken, poorly regulated system and these defendants were foot soldiers for the most part in a global financial system beyond their full understanding. The convictions strike the harshest of warnings for those operating at relatively junior levels in financial markets and in other fields of commercial life where the way in which business is routinely done may sometimes, years later, be characterised as criminal by those with 20/20 hindsight and a massive banking crisis for which politicians wanted to find someone to blame.”

Ruth Harris, criminal defence partner at Hodge Jones & Allen, said the convictions “will no doubt be seen as a great success for David Green, director of the SFO, who accepted that his organisation will largely be judged on this investigation. “It will be interesting to see how the SFO proceeds from here, and whether it will continue to expand its investigation or will be satisfied with the convictions as reflecting the state of criminality in this area.”

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll