header-logo header-logo

Liable to be liable?

17 May 2012 / Clare Arthurs
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Clare Arthurs tackles insolvency practitioners & personal liability

Good news for insolvency practitioners (IPs); bad news for disgruntled creditors: the High Court has held that IPs will not be personally liable for the costs of litigation commenced against them.

Round one

In Wright Hassall LLP v Duncan Morris [2012] EWHC 188 (Ch), Morris became administrator of two companies, which were defendants in ongoing litigation (the companies). Wright Hassall LLP (WH) agreed to act, and two conditional fee agreements (CFAs) were entered into: one for the initial advice given, and one for conducting the litigation. The CFAs were addressed to “Mr D Morris, the Redfern Partnership” and (unlike many of the other documents drawn up by both Morris and WH) they did not contain any disclaimer for Morris’ personal liability.

WH issued a claim form for unpaid invoices in March 2009 against Morris and his partner, trading as Redfern Partnership (Redfern). Morris argued that he had retained WH in his capacity as administrator and not in a personal capacity. The contemporaneous correspondence supported

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll