header-logo header-logo

24 June 2022
Issue: 7984 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

LexisNexis: How to grow a law firm

Law firms may grow better by ‘maximising’ what they have, than by embarking on mergers and acquisition, an investigative report suggests

The report, ‘The laws of organic growth’, published this week by LexisNexis Legal & Professional studied the methods of 20 of the UK’s fastest-growing law firms of varying sizes and specialisms. Its publication comes at a time when many law firms are looking for opportunities to expand, having met or exceeded their 2021 end of year financial targets. The legal sector achieved an all-time revenue high of £41.58bn in 2021, up almost £5bn on the previous year.

According to the report, law firms tend to pursue growth through mergers and acquisitions, enabling them to benefit immediately from the arrival of a pre-existing team. However, this approach carries risks―the loss of a law firm’s culture during a merger can be devastating for staff retention, recruitment, and client acquisition.

Instead, law firms are finding ways to ‘leverage and maximise’ their current client relationships, by giving partners formal training in sales techniques and encouraging secondments with important clients, the report found. Firms are investing in ways to generate business such as publishing thought leadership articles, organising, and attending trade events, joining industry bodies, and creating bespoke content for clients. One popular approach is to bundle additional business services, such as legal technology solutions together with traditional legal services, to create a personalised package with greater value.

Some of the contributors to the report attribute their growth to attracting and retaining the right people, arguing this type of growth is more sustainable and targeted than the disruption of a merger.

Dylan Brown, the report’s editor, said: ‘While there is no “one-size-fits-all” approach to growth, it's clear that there are some winning strategies law firms of all sizes are deploying to drive growth organically.’ Read the report here.

Issue: 7984 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll