header-logo header-logo

A level playing field

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Professional athletes should have the right to challenge their regulatory bodies, says John Cooper

Any lawyer who has appeared in front of a regulatory tribunal, perhaps more particularly if you are representing a sports person, will realise what a foreboding and alien environment it is, when compared to the normal principle of what constitutes a fair hearing and a just decision.

It is undesirable that the public courts should be suffocated by disputes which can properly be resolved within the regulatory framework, but if that is acknowledged as a sensible and practical way forward, it should also follow that the regulatory tribunals should be perceived as fair and without bias. But perhaps even more fundamental than that, the member should be allowed access to the disciplinary process to begin with—something which does not seem to be happening.

Sporting lawyers
The involvement of lawyers in the business of sports regulatory bodies has been increasing over the last few years or so. The approach is simple. Deal with disputes with members who have offended the contractual terms of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll