header-logo header-logo

Lessons learned

15 April 2010 / Henrietta Hill
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

How will the judgment in G affect employees outside the schoolroom? Henrietta Hill reports

In R (on the application of G) v (1) Governors of X School (2) Y City Council (Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families and the Equality and Human Rights intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1, [2010] All ER (D) 118 (Jan) the claimant was a part-time teaching assistant. It was alleged that he had kissed a 15-year-old boy who was undertaking work experience at the defendant’s school and had sought to groom him with a view to conducting a sexual relationship with him.

During the internal proceedings before the disciplinary committee of the school’s governors, the claimant asked to be permitted legal representation at the hearing. The request was refused and he was told that he was only entitled to be accompanied by a work colleague or union representative. The disciplinary committee found the allegations established and dismissed the claimant. The claimant appealed to the appeal committee of the school’s governors, again requesting permission to be legally represented and again he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll