header-logo header-logo

04 December 2019
Issue: 7867 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Legislation low: Brexit is all-consuming

Little has been achieved during the Brexit years because the government has been overwhelmed by preparations for life outside the EU

Much-needed work such as the apprenticeship levy and business rates reform to boost the high street retail sector fell by the wayside, while the task of addressing problems caused by the pensions super tax was neglected, research from Thomson Reuters shows. Moreover, many of the policies suggested by the 2017 government-commissioned Taylor Review into the gig economy have not yet been implemented.

In the year up to the end of September, the number of non-Brexit related laws affecting business fell 21% to just 685―the fourth successive fall (starting 2015/16), which means the total has halved since 1,500 laws in the year before the 2016 EU Referendum.

‘Basic legislation aimed at keeping the statute book fit for purpose has been pushed down the agenda,’ said Daniel Greenberg, lawyer specialising in legislation and former parliamentary counsel.

‘Whether you support Brexit or not, the stark drop in business laws passed shows just how time-consuming Brexit is. As well as Brexit, the government’s lack of a Parliamentary majority continues to make passing business-related laws difficult. Opposition from merely a handful of Conservative MPs can stop a piece of legislation, which is likely to have dissuaded the government from introducing new laws and reforms.’

Those pieces of businesses-related legislation that have been passed in the last year include Acts to allow enforcement authorities to request data from non-UK communication providers and introduce changes to corporation tax, capital allowances and vehicle duties, and regulations to allow the authorities to freeze the assets of suspected cyber-attackers.

Issue: 7867 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll