header-logo header-logo

16 June 2021
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Legal UK looks to Oz following trade deal

Lawyers have welcomed the UK-Australia trade deal but warned ‘practical barriers’ still exist.

The main elements of the trade deal, which could provide a template for future deals, were agreed this week and cover market access for services professionals, tariff-free goods, a cap for 15 years on tariff-free agricultural products and more work visas for people under the age of 35. A final agreement in principle will be published in the coming days. Trade between the UK and Australia is currently worth just £13.9bn and £5.4bn worth of services but the deal is seen as a gateway to the UK joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said the deal could create opportunities for legal professionals.

‘The two countries already have a strong foundation given the long-standing relationship between Australian and the UK legal regulators, representative bodies and professionals,’ she said. 

‘However, there are still practical barriers that prevent the realisation of the full benefit of trade in legal services between our countries. These difficulties increase costs for clients; limit international opportunities for local lawyers; and reduce the skills transfer and contribution to the local market, particularly for those without the support of larger organisations.

‘Before the negotiations, we were clear that it would be beneficial for the legal sector to have a greater variety of business structures—such as the UK LLP—available in both jurisdictions, greater recognition of professional qualifications, regardless of route to qualification and without need for additional study, as well as increased mobility options.

‘On the free flow of data provisions and the ban on data localisation, we urge the UK government to consider the specific characteristics for legal services. Legal professionals follow their own professional obligations.

‘It is important that personal data processed by law firms are well-protected and that the fundamental rights of client confidentiality and legal professional privilege (LPP) are safeguarded in such trade agreements.’

Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll