header-logo header-logo

Legal profession independence threatened

01 May 2008
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Spending cuts, career politicians, media excess and consumerism are all combining to threaten the independence of the legal profession, says Bar chairman Tim Dutton QC.

Addressing the Criminal Bar Association conference in , Dutton said a shift in mindsets and attitudes was affecting the Bar’s ability as an independent profession to discharge its duties vigorously and independently. He said: “[One] influence is not just a desire to control expenditure—laudable in itself for us as taxpayers—but we have seen in recent years the use of expenditure controls to encroach upon our professional independence and judgment. “A combination of media excess and consumerism is creating an environment in which politicians and others attack the professions, and ours in particular. The irony is that those who launch attacks upon the profession are also the people who use it the most.”

He says that from an increasingly young age our “political class” is drawn from people who see politics as their career almost from university. “The fact that politics is now the ‘profession’ which politicians pursue means that some are unable from personal experience or adherence to professional codes and training to understand the significance within society of professions such as ours, the essential requirement that each of the liberal professions must remain independent, strong, and free to exercise professional judgments in the best interests of those for whom they act.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll