header-logo header-logo

07 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Legal profession brainstorms Brexit

Law Society’s research suggests long term pain may follow short term gains

Lawyers could enjoy a short-term “Brexit bonanza” but would be disproportionately affected in the long-term, the Law Society’s chief executive has warned.

Law firms have been busy compiling advice in the run-up to the 23 June referendum. Herbert Smith, for example, has compiled a detailed briefing on the topic and Allen & Overy’s Global Law Intelligence Unit has published a paper providing a lawyer’s view on a broad range of associated legal issues.

Writing in NLJ this week, Catherine Dixon, chief executive of the Law Society, which does not hold a position on Brexit, says: “In the short term some solicitors could enjoy their widely trailed ‘Brexit bonanza’ as agreements are unpicked, contracts altered, new domestic rules written and the legal complexities of any changed relationship with the EU unravelled.

“However, based on an independent assessment we commissioned by Oxford Economics [The UK legal services sector and the EU], in the longer term a UK withdrawal is likely to disadvantage the legal services sector disproportionately when compared to other comparative areas of economic activity. This is due to the work we do for other sectors which are likely to be adversely affected themselves by Brexit.”

Lawyers—In for Britain, a group of British lawyers, published a detailed report last month setting out the case for EU membership. John Davies, Chairman, says: “Our conclusion is that the UK is stronger, safer and better off in the EU.”

However, this report was criticised by Lawyers for Britain, a group chaired by Martin Howe QC, which is campaigning for Britain to leave the current treaties and build a new relationship with the EU which preserves our trading links. They argue that the prime minister’s renegotiation changes little and reveals the UK’s lack of influence and the inability of the EU to reform. They argue that the EU reforms poor laws too slowly or not at all and that there are many pitfalls to EU regulatory harmonisation.

Deloitte’s latest quarterly survey of chief financial officers found that a potential Brexit is the top concern for Britain’s biggest businesses at the moment, yet 53% have “no plans” in place.

Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll