header-logo header-logo

16 June 2020
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal market shows signs of growth despite pandemic

Legal market report indicates certain practice areas performing strongly

A LexisNexis report has revealed the areas of law most and least hit by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The legal publishing giant’s first Gross Legal Product (GLP) index report, released this week, tracks various representative metrics to measure the impact on different areas of the legal market and predict the long-term impact.

According to the index report, the legal market contracted 2.5% in the first quarter of 2020―but this shrinkage was not universal. The GLP showed that some practice areas are growing, for example, employment law is faring well as companies work to understand the short and medium-term legal consequences of furloughing 7.5 million employees.

The GLP indicated that commercial, tax and employment law will continue its recent strong growth or the crisis will give practitioners in these areas an opportunity to rebound in financial services, restructuring and insolvency. It found an 8% growth in commercial law in the past three months, and predicted that demand for in-house legal work would continue to grow, particularly for corporate lawyers.

And while the larger firms will weather the storm, the report indicated that it will be the smaller firms of corporate lawyers who do best, emerging stronger and larger as they are less exposed to the contracting parts of the market.

On the negative side, the GLP revealed the extent of the lockdown’s devastating impact on certain practice areas, notably the residential market. Residential sales are down 70%, while a distressed commercial real estate sector has seen property legal activity drop by 25%. Immigration has been equally affected.  Originally fast growing as businesses and individuals grappled with the complexities of Brexit, it has suffered from the suspension of global travel.

Chris O’Connor, LexisNexis head of segment marketing and author of the report, said: ‘The report has brought clarity and data to a very complex time in the legal industry. 

‘These are tough times for the legal market. I hope that this report helps legal practitioners to make the very difficult decisions that lie ahead.’

For comparison, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) fell 20.4% in April, according to Office of National Statistics figures.

The GLP report can be accessed at bit.ly/ 2CgfE7r.

Issue: 7891 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll