header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid in dire straits

Legal aid services are on the brink of collapse, CILEx (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) has warned

Responding last week to the Justice Select Committee’s inquiry on ‘The future of legal aid’, CILEx said legal aid was already at a critical stage before the pandemic, with members reporting growing problems with recruitment and retention due to repeated government cuts and many firms moving away from the legal aid sector altogether. The COVID-19 pandemic has piled on further financial hardship.

CILEx President Craig Tickner, a specialist criminal defence advocate, said: ‘The precarious financial stability of legal aid firms pre-dates the current Covid crisis.

‘For as long as we can remember we have been calling for proper funding and additional resources, engaging with review processes such as the Criminal Legal Aid Review. With COVID-19 now hovering over remaining providers like the grim reaper, action is needed now. Any delay will be too late.’

In its response, the organisation warned that funding cuts caused by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) had disincentivised practitioners from working in legal aid and created ‘incessant court backlogs’ through under-resourcing the sector. Consequently, the legal aid market was ‘increasingly dependent on a limited pool of providers to provide an unrealistic level of output, worsened by new initiatives, such as extended opening hours for the court estate’.

As well as increased funding for legal aid work, CILEx called for earlier access to payment for legal aid work to help financially precarious firms, ‘In order to help safeguard income streams, manage risk and protect the financial longevity of providers in supplying legal aid services’.

The Justice Select Committee inquiry aims to look at the major challenges facing clients and providers, market sustainability, impact of COVID-19 and the increasing reliance on digital technology. Read more at: bit.ly/338AOxQ.

Issue: 7909 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll