header-logo header-logo

30 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid fees rise for police station & youth court

Criminal legal aid solicitors have been offered a pay rise for police station and youth court work

£16m will be used to increase fees for duty solicitor work in police stations, and the fee scheme simplified by raising the lowest charges, according to the eight-week Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation published this week, Crime lower: criminal legal aid.

Currently, fixed fees for police station work vary by geographic area, with 245 different fees across England and Wales. The fees were set in 2008, based on the average cost then of a case in each area.

The consultation proposes two options for harmonising the fee schemes. The first is to increase 174 schemes to £225.63 (excl VAT), with no rise for fee schemes above this amount (all 32 London schemes and 39 non-London schemes are above this amount). The second, and the MoJ’s preferred option, is to increase 173 non-London schemes to £223.52 (excl VAT) and 26 London schemes to £264,45 (excl VAT).

Youth court fees for the most serious offences will be raised by £548 per case, accounting for £5.1m of additional funds.

The funding comes from £21.1m per year allocated to longer-term reforms from the financial year 2024-2025, as part of the MoJ’s response to the Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review (CLAIR). The CLAIR, which reported in 2021, found the police station and youth court fee schemes outdated and not reflective of the complexity of work involved. This week’s consultation addresses how the £21.1m is distributed.

The fee rises apply to new work from summer 2024.

Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk said duty solicitors ‘play a critical role in ensuring access to justice by giving people legal advice, often at antisocial hours and at a moment’s notice’£548 (not inc. VAT) fee increase in the Youth Court.

However, Law Society president Nick Emmerson said the extra money was ‘a small step in the right direction’ but ‘still leaves the increased expenditure below that identified by Lord Bellamy as “the minimum necessary”… Moreover, the impact of these increases, including those announced [this week] has been wiped out by inflation’.

The consultation ends on 28 March.

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll