header-logo header-logo

Legal aid boost for housing & immigration practitioners

09 July 2025
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Immigration & asylum , Housing
printer mail-detail
A proposed £20m boost for housing and immigration legal aid practitioners has been confirmed

The investment will increase overall spend by 24% on housing legal aid and by 30% on immigration and asylum legal aid, and is the first real-terms fees rise for 30 years.

According to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), it means the fixed fee for housing work will increase by 42% from £157 to £223 and the fixed fee for asylum legal help will increase by 35% from £413 to £559.

The MoJ said the investment will be implemented ‘as soon as operationally possible’.

However, Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘Our research has found that this work is simply not profitable for practitioners at present, indeed a 95% increase is needed to restore fees to 1996 levels.’

Both Atkinson and Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, urged the government to create an independent fee review body for legal aid.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll