header-logo header-logo

29 November 2024
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid boost for eviction, disrepair, asylum, trafficking & domestic abuse cases

Lawyers have hailed the first increase in civil legal aid in 30 years—an extra £20m for housing and immigration. The last funding rise was in 1996.

The government will consult in January on proposals to increase fees for housing and immigration legal aid work to £65/£69 per hour (non-London/London), or provide a 10% uplift, whichever is higher.

The Ministry of Justice is also considering fees in other civil legal aid categories, ‘including as part of the second phase of the government’s spending review, due in Spring 2025’.

Announcing the rise this week, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the government ‘is determined to improve the civil legal aid sector which was left neglected for years’.

Bar Council chair, Sam Townend KC said; ‘For decades the civil legal aid sector has been starved of funds to save money.

‘But the cuts have impacted access to justice for children, families and vulnerable adults, as well as increasing overall public spending costs. This money is welcome as a first step, but we know further investment will be needed.

‘We will consider the detailed proposals in the consultation and, particularly, whether the investment will be sufficient to stem the exodus of practitioners from these vital areas of work… there is a real crisis now as a result of decades of underinvestment in these sectors.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said the increase was ‘encouraging’ and ‘will help ease the huge asylum backlog, ensuring the efficient running of the system in a way that gets the right decision at the earliest opportunity.

‘This will ensure representation for families fighting eviction, tackling housing disrepair or a survivor of abuse seeking protection from a violent partner’.

Issue: 8097 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll