header-logo header-logo

Leeds Utd score in High Court

02 August 2012
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Football team gain victory over West Yorkshire Police

Leeds United FC won a legal challenge against West Yorkshire Police over the cost of policing matches in the High Court last week.

In Leeds United FC v West Yorkshire Police [2012] EWHC 2113 (QB), Mr Justice Eady, who was shown footage of crowds around Elland Road Stadium, considered to what extent West Yorkshire could recoup policing costs around the “immediate environs of the club premises”. Leeds United currently pays nearly £1m per year towards “special police services”, a fourfold increase from the £250,000 it paid three years ago.

West Yorkshire Police argued it was entitled to levy charges on the club based on a “footprint”, which included policing on the public highway and on publicly accessible land such as car parks and a bus station.

The club did not object to paying for policing within the Elland Road ground or on land owned, leased or controlled by it.

Eady J held that policing on the public highway and on public land fell within “the normal constabulary duty to keep the peace”. Therefore, the costs of such policing were not recoverable from Leeds United.

Sports lawyer Mark Gay, partner at Burges Salmon, who acted for Leeds United, says the judgment also has implications for organisers of rock concerts and demonstrations, who may be asked to pay policing costs. He says: “This is a significant case, which establishes what the police can charge for.”

Issue: 7525 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll