header-logo header-logo

Leaving the farm: Gee v Gee & anor

22 June 2018
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

A son whose father made longstanding promises to leave the £8m family farm to him has succeeded in his claim

John Gee junior had worked long hours for low wages since the 1970s with the expectation he would take over ‘the lion’s share’ of the farm, but in 2014 it was transferred to his brother Robert.

Mr Justice Birss awarded John junior a 52% controlling interest in the farm and 48% interest in the land. Robert Gee retained a minority shareholding and interest in the land.

Commenting on Gee v Gee & anor [2018] EWHC 1393 (Ch) for LexisNexis Legal Analysis, Shoosmiths partner Adam Draper said: ‘Birss J was satisfied that a proprietary estoppel had been made out over the farm.’

He said John junior’s claims was helped by an earlier will, supportive evidence from his mother and sister, and evidence given by John senior that contradicted itself.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll