header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Leave professional independence alone says Bar

News

The Bar has renewed calls for an amendment to the Legal Services Bill to guarantee the profession’s independence, after a financial report that shows UK legal business contributes to 1.4% of the UK’s gross domestic product (GDP).

The latest International Financial Services London report on legal services shows legal activities amounted to £14.9bn of GDP in 2004, while net exports of UK legal services were estimated to be £1.8bn.

Incorporating the earnings of the Chancery Bar Association and a range of other legal specialisms in which barristers carry out international work, the Bar’s contribution to the value of the UK’s service exports is around £200m.
Geoffrey Vos QC, chairman of the Bar says the timing of the report is very helpful, bearing in mind the passage of the Legal Services Bill.

“It shows how important the profession’s independence is to our overseas clients,” he says. “This is one reason why the Bar is so keen to seek an amendment to the Bill, which would ensure that appointments to the new Legal Services Board are seen to be independent, and are therefore made with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice.”

He adds that if appointments are made solely by the Lord Chancellor, this will send out the wrong message about the impartiality of the legal profession.

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll