header-logo header-logo

Leases

19 January 2012
Issue: 7497 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Ltd and another company [2011] EWHC 3422 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 20 (Jan)

 

The general common law rule was that a creditor should pay his debt by a tender of legal currency and a cheque was not legal currency. Applying Beevers v Mason (1978) 37 P & CR 452, the general common law rule might be waived by express arrangement, or by necessary implication where the facts were sufficiently strong to establish that the landlord had shown that he was content to accept payment by cheque posted by the due date of payment. The general common law rule did not apply where there was an express or implied agreement to the contrary. Such an agreement could be inferred from conduct. Inferences of that nature were not to be too readily drawn, but, where the facts supported them clearly and emphatically, they were not to be dismissed.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll