header-logo header-logo

13 June 2024
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Leading AI product launches in the UK

Lexis+ AI, the artificial intelligence tool based on reliable legal content and designed specifically for lawyers, is now generally available for customers in the UK

The announcement, made this week by LexisNexis Legal & Professional, follows the commercial launches of the product in the US and Australia.

Lexis+ AI provides direct links in its responses to citable authority from LexisNexis, the world’s largest repository of legal content.

This means users can instantly validate results, safeguarding against the risk of invented content or hallucinations. Cases of ChatGPT hallucinating or inventing fictitious cases have been reported in both the US and Canada after lawyers used the generic AI tool for legal research. 

However, Lexis+ AI automatically checks all linked citations against LexisNexis’ content to ensure they are valid. The LexisNexis repository contains primary, secondary, analytical content and practical guidance modules.

Gerry Duffy, managing director of LexisNexis UK, said: ‘This is a pivotal moment in the history of the UK legal industry.

‘We have had unprecedented levels of interest in Lexis+ AI from our market and as of today, many of our customers will be enjoying the competitive advantage of having access to our rich and authoritative content combined with our leading AI technology.’

The product was developed with input from law firms including Macfarlanes, Eversheds Sutherland, Pinsent Masons and CMS UK.

Eleanor Windsor, partner and director of knowledge management at Irwin Mitchell, which has selected Lexis+ AI, said it would enable lawyers to ask questions as they would to a trusted colleague, with cited and linked answers.

LexisNexis describes Lexis+ AI’s features as including ‘conversational search, intelligent legal drafting, insightful summarisation, and document upload capabilities, all supported by state-of-the-art encryption and privacy technology to keep sensitive data secure’.

For more information on Lexis+ AI or for a demo, visit Lexisnexis.co.uk/lexis-plus/lexis-plus-ai.html

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll