header-logo header-logo

27 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Conveyancing , Employment
printer mail-detail

Lawyers respond to mini-budget

Conveyancers brace for heavy workload following stamp duty cut

The stamp duty land tax threshold has been raised with immediate effect and the 45% income tax rate (paid by those earning more than £150,000 per year) is to be abolished next year.

Basic income tax will be reduced by one pence to 19p per pound next year.  Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng also abolished caps on bankers’ bonuses, announced plans for more City deregulation, axed the proposed increase in corporation tax from 19% to 25%, and has confirmed the National Insurance increase to pay for the NHS and social care will be halted in November.

While the pound plunged to below $1.09 in response to the mini-budget—its lowest since 1985—Kwarteng said the measures would boost economic growth by attracting investment.

Stamp duty thresholds on residential properties will rise from £125,000 to £250,000, and £300,000 to £450,000 for first-time buyers. The ceiling for first-time buyers’ relief has been raised from £500,000 to £625,000.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said ‘conveyancing solicitors will now be watching and waiting to see how the changes announced will impact their workload and businesses’.

Winckworth Sherwood partner Blair Adams said the measures ‘may relieve some of the pressure on businesses caused by rising costs in the supply chain and increased energy costs’ and ‘may also take some of the urgency out of employee demands for large pay increases’.

‘One specific employment law measure that has been announced today is the proposal to scrap the off-payroll working rules from April 2023, for both the public and private sectors. This will mean that end-user clients engaging individuals via intermediaries will no longer be responsible for determining the tax status of the arrangement and, potentially, for payments of tax. 

‘Instead, the liability will fall back on the intermediary. Having spoken to end-user clients about this already, this is seen as a positive step.’

Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Conveyancing , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll