header-logo header-logo

Lawyers predict increased time saving with AI

11 September 2024
Issue: 8085 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Profession
printer mail-detail

UK lawyers believe AI technology could save them nearly 140 hours of work per year

A Thomson Reuters report, ‘Future of professionals 2024’, surveyed 1,200 legal professionals, more than half of whom thought the potential for time saving was the most exciting aspect of AI.

The lawyers predicted they would save three hours a week within the first year of using artificial intelligence (AI), seven hours by the third year and up to 11 hours after five years.

Kriti Sharma, chief product officer, legal tech at Thomson Reuters, said: ‘It’s exciting to see law firms running AI pilot programmes and making long-term investments in the technology as trust around safe usage grows.’

In January, LexisNexis launched a generative AI product, Lexis+ AI, in the UK, which uses LexisNexis’s own authoritative content. It delivers search, summarisation and drafting for legal professionals, incorporating privacy by design since customers’ searches don’t feed the language model.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll