header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lawyers brace for no deal

The legal sector could suffer a ‘significant’ slowdown in the event of no deal Brexit, the Law Society has warned.

The UK is currently Europe’s biggest international provider of legal services, and the second biggest in the world. However, a Law Society report published last week, ‘UK-EU future partnership―legal services sector’, predicts a less successful future if no deal goes ahead. The report includes case studies illustrating the extra costs, bureaucracy and legal obstacles for UK law firms advising clients with interests in the EU post-Brexit under no deal.

Law Society President Simon Davis warned: ‘According to our estimates, the volume of work in legal services would be down £3.5bn―nearly 10% lower than under an orderly Brexit.

‘Our sector contributed £27.9bn to the UK in 2018―1.4% of GDP―and in 2017 posted a trade surplus of £4.4bn, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Much of this balance of payments surplus is down to access provided by EU Lawyers’ Directives.’

Under our current arrangement, solicitors can advise clients across the EU on matters relating to all types of law, including EU law and the law of the host state, have their qualifications recognised, can employ or be employed by local lawyers in a different member state and form partnerships with lawyers from other member states, set up an office in another member state, have all communications with EU clients protected by legal professional privilege, and represent clients in courts across the EU.

Davis called on the government to negotiate an agreement that replicates the Lawyers’ Directives, enabling solicitors to maintain their right to practise in the EU. He said precedents for such an agreement existed, for example, the EU has association agreements through the EEA with Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland and with Switzerland.

Legal and accounting activities contributed an estimated £19.1bn in tax to the Treasury last year.

Issue: 7852 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll