header-logo header-logo

A law unto themselves

18 September 2008 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

What drives vexatious litigants? B Mahendra reports

The spectrum of those dissatisfied with the processes of the law runs from the “barrack room lawyer” inveighing in saloon bars against judges and lawyers, through to the person preoccupied by one irksome decision—involving himself or someone close to him—to those who are truly successful in getting into the hair of the law, namely, the vexatious litigant.

These are persons who usually come to have a staggering knowledge of some area of the law, enough to put many specialist lawyers to shame, not to mention the law firms where they soon become persona non grata. An alphabetical list of those individuals who have been declared vexatious litigants is available on the HM Courts Service website. The list is surprisingly extensive suggesting that the undue preoccupation some individuals have with the law and their quest for justice, as they see it, is more widespread than may appear at first sight. Experience suggests that there is both a male as well as middle class bias to the background of these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll