header-logo header-logo

A law unto themselves

18 September 2008 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

What drives vexatious litigants? B Mahendra reports

The spectrum of those dissatisfied with the processes of the law runs from the “barrack room lawyer” inveighing in saloon bars against judges and lawyers, through to the person preoccupied by one irksome decision—involving himself or someone close to him—to those who are truly successful in getting into the hair of the law, namely, the vexatious litigant.

These are persons who usually come to have a staggering knowledge of some area of the law, enough to put many specialist lawyers to shame, not to mention the law firms where they soon become persona non grata. An alphabetical list of those individuals who have been declared vexatious litigants is available on the HM Courts Service website. The list is surprisingly extensive suggesting that the undue preoccupation some individuals have with the law and their quest for justice, as they see it, is more widespread than may appear at first sight. Experience suggests that there is both a male as well as middle class bias to the background of these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll