header-logo header-logo

Practice—Offer to settle—Technical error in Pt 36 offer

30 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

AF v BG [2009] EWCA Civ 757, [2009] All ER (D) 249 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lloyd and Rimer LJJ, 21 Jul 2009

A CPR Pt 36 offer may be made by a defendant in respect of a claim and potential counterclaim, even if the latter has not yet been pleaded.

The respondent (the defendant to the original proceedings) wrote a letter to the applicant (the claimant) headed “without prejudice save as to costs” and “Pt 36 offer”. It was stated that, inter alia, the applicant was obliged to reimburse the respondent for certain expenditure under a collateral agreement. It further stated that the respondent had a counterclaim against the applicant which had not at that time been pleaded. The letter stated that the respondent was “willing to accept payment of [a specified sum, smaller than that identified...as the subject of the intended counterclaim] (the sum) in full and final settlement of the whole of our client’s claim and the whole of your claim against our client in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll