header-logo header-logo

Law Reports

SENTENCE—COMMUNITY SERVICE ORDER—BREACH OF COMMUNITY SERVICE ORDER

Probation Board v Sutton Coldfield Magistrates’ Court

[2008] EWHC 15 (Admin)

Queen’s Bench Division, Divisional

Court

Dyson LJ and Jack J

11 January 2008

 

The bare fact that an appeal has been lodged cannot afford a reasonable excuse to a defendant for failing to comply with the requirements of a community order.

 

Sanjeev Sharma (instructed by Richard A Steer) for the West

Probation Board.

The respondent did not appear and was not represented.

 

The interested parties were convicted of an offence of affray and, in 10 October 2005, were made subject to a community order for 12 months—with an unpaid work requirement of 240 hours. They lodged notices of appeal against conviction. They were required by the probation service to attend for unpaid work appointments on 8 and 22 January 2006. They failed to attend on both occasions on the grounds that they were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll