header-logo header-logo

Parliamentary privilege—MPs’ expenses—Whether expense claims subject to Parliamentary privilege

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

R v Chaytor and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1910, [2010] All ER (D) 335 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, Lord Judge CJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Sir Anthony May P,. 30 July 2010

Parliamentary privilege or immunity from criminal prosecution has never attached to ordinary criminal activities by members of Parliament, and does not preclude prosecution for any criminal offences committed with regard to the Parliamentary allowances or expenses scheme.

Lord Pannick QC, L Mably, Mr J Segan and H Laws for the Crown, Nigel Pleming QC and J Knowles for David Chaytor,  E. Fitzgerald QC and J Middleton for Elliot Morley. Gavin Millar QC and R Trowler for James Devine. A Jones QC and R Bowers for Lord Hanningfield.

The four defendants were all charged with allegations of false accounting contrary to s 17(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968, in relation to their claims for expenses as members of Parliament. An essential ingredient common to all is that the actions involved dishonesty. Three of the defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll