header-logo header-logo

Civil procedure—Privilege—Law Society

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Quinn Direct Insurance Ltd v The Law Society of England and Wales [2010] EWCA Civ 805, [2010] All ER (D) 134 (Jul).

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Andrew Morritt C, Rimer and Jackson LJJ, 14 July 2010.

There is no reason to imply into the statutory scheme for the regulation of solicitors any provision or term entitling or obliging the Law Society to produce to a qualifying insurer documents emanating from a firm of solicitors into which it has intervened which are subject to the privilege of a client of the firm. If the client consents, or his privilege is impliedly waived by a claim against the solicitor, then the Society can produce such documents to the qualifying insurer.

N Davidson QC (instructed by Crutes LLP) for the insurers. T Dutton QC and M Smith (instructed by Devonshires Solicitors) for the Law Society.

The Law Society formed the view that a firm (SBS) had not complied with the Solicitors’ Accounts Rules, and intervened in the practice pursuant to its powers under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll