header-logo header-logo

Costs—Assessment—Estimate of costs

22 July 2010
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Rowles-Davies and others v Call 24-7 Ltd [2010] EWHC 1695 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 96 (Jul).

Bernard Livesey QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court,
7 July 2010.

The Chancery Division of the High Court ruled on the issue of costs following a previous judgment on the substantive issues between the parties in respect of the construction of a term in a contract for the provision of solicitor audit services by a company owned by the first claimant to the defendant company.

James Couser (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimants. Iain Pester (instructed by Nexus, Manchester ) for the defendant.

The proceedings concerned costs awards following judgment in the substantive action, which was handed down in June 2010 (see [2010] All ER (D) 121 (Jun). The claimants submitted, inter alia, that the unsuccessful party should be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party pursuant to CPR 44.3(2)(a) and that the court should have regard to the conduct of the defendant. On those grounds the claimants’ costs should be assessed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll