header-logo header-logo

Shipping—Charterparty—Deck cargo

06 May 2010
Issue: 7416 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Onego Shipping and Chartering BV v JSC Arcadia Shipping, M/V ‘Socol 3’ [2010] EWHC 777 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 179 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, 23 April 2010 Hamblen J

Where a charterparty incorporates the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules and envisages that deck cargo might be carried but does not provide an on-deck statement, the rules apply to the carriage of deck cargo unless the bill(s) of lading issued for the cargo contain an on-deck statement as required.

Moreover, cl 13(b) of the NYPE 1993 Form provides owners with an indemnity in respect of loss caused by the carriage of deck cargo but not for loss caused by negligence and/or breach of the obligation of seaworthiness on the part of owners, their servants and agents.

Luke Parsons QC and Poonam Melwani (instructed by Reed Smith LLP) for the claimant. Chirag Karia (instructed by Bentleys Stokes and Lowless) for the defendant.

The parties entered into a charterparty on the NYPE 1993 form with amendments. The charter was for a one time trip from Finland/Sweden intention Loviisa and Kokkola

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll