header-logo header-logo

Libel and slander—Defamatory words—Article split between front page and later pages of newspaper

06 May 2010
Issue: 7416 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Dee v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 924 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 215 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Sharp J, 28 Apr 2010

Whether two articles in a newspaper on the same issue should be read separately or together for the purpose of determining meaning is a question which may be determined by the judge on a summary application rather than the jury. 

Andrew Caldecott QC and David Sherborne (instructed by Addleshaw Goddard) for the claimant. David Price of David Price, Solicitors & Advocates for the defendant.

The claimant was a professional tennis player.  He brought proceedings in libel against the defendant, a newspaper publisher, in respect of an article on the bottom left hand corner of the front page of the newspaper in April 2008 under the heading “World’s worst tennis pro wins at last”. The article stated that the claimant had lost 54 matches in a row, and had not won a single match in his first three years on the circuit.  Underneath

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll