header-logo header-logo

18 March 2010
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Contract—Construction—Contractual term

RTS Flexible Systems Ltd (Respondent) v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh & Co KG (UK Production) (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 14, [2010] All ER (D) 95 (Mar)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips (President), Lord Mance, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke 10 March 2010

The Supreme Court has considered the principles concerning the terms governing relations between parties where no formal contract has been concluded.

Stuart Catchpole QC and Charles Manzoni QC (instructed by Addleshaw Goddard LLP) for the respondent. Kenneth MacLean QC and Michael Fealy (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) for the appellant.

The defendant produced different brands of yoghurt and dairy rice products. The claimant specialised in the supply of automated machines for packaging and product handling in the food and consumer goods industry. The defendant wished to automate some of its processes and began negotiations with the claimant. Following a number of quotations by the claimant, the defendant sent a letter of intent, which covered an initial period, but which subsequently lapsed.

The claimant started work before the terms of the contract had been agreed. Negotiations

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll