header-logo header-logo

Bankruptcy-Appeal-Appeal from bankruptcy order

21 January 2010
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Ross and another v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWHC 13 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 49 (Jan)

Chancery Division, Henderson J, 12 January 2010

The relevant test to be applied in deciding whether a refusal to accept an offer was reasonable, pursuant to s 271 of the Insolvency Act 1986, is whether a reasonable creditor, in the position of the petitioning creditor, and in the light of the actual history as disclosed to the court, would have accepted or refused the offer.

The debtors appeared in person. Jonathan Lopian (instructed by the Solicitor for Her Majesties Revenue Commissioners) for HMRC.

The appeal before the court concerned bankruptcy orders made against the two debtors in July 2009. Both were solicitors, and former partners. The petitioning creditors were the commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

The commissioners had served statutory demands on the debtors in respect of unpaid partnership and self assessment tax liabilities. No applications were made to set aside the statutory demand. Bankruptcy petitions were presented.

The debtors offered a number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll