header-logo header-logo

Employment—Discrimination—Philosophical belief

12 November 2009
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Nicholson v Grainger plc and others [2009] All ER (D) 59 (Nov), UKEAT/0219/09/ZT

Employment Appeal Tribunal, Burton J, 3 November 2009
A belief in man-made climate change is capable of amounting to a “philosophical belief” for the purposes of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), (EER 2003).
John Bowers QC (instructed by Grange Wintringham) for the employee. Dinah Rose QC and Ivan Hare (instructed by Bindmans LLP) for the employer.

The employee worked for the employer until July 1998 when, according to the employer, he was dismissed on the ground of redundancy. The employee brought a complaint before an employment tribunal, contending that he had been unfairly dismissed and subjected to discrimination contrary to EER 2003, due to his asserted philosophical belief about climate change and the environment.

Paragraph 3 of the Regulations provided “(1) For the purposes of these Regulations, a person (“A”) discriminates against another person (“B”) if … (a) on the grounds of the religion or belief of B … A treats B less favourably than he treats or would treat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll