header-logo header-logo

Costs—Payment of costs by non-party—Funder of litigation

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Thomson v Berkhamsted Collegiate School [2009] EWHC 2374 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 39 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Blake J, 2 October 2009

The High Court has reviewed the principles relating to disclosure of material pertaining to orders for costs against third parties.

Gordon Wignall (instructed by Irwin Mitchell) for the interested parties.
Andrew Miller (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer) for the defendant.

The claimant brought an action against his former school in relation to damage caused to him through the alleged failure of the school to take proper measures to prevent him from being bullied.

The proceedings were issued in June 2006 and discontinued in March 2009. The school by that stage had incurred costs of approximately £250,000 in defending the action.

The claimant was unable to meet any costs order. The school contended that the action had been wholly misconceived, and sought an order for costs against third parties, pursuant to s 51 Supreme Court Act 1981 and CPR 48.2.

The interested parties, who had funded the action, were joined

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll