header-logo header-logo

Law lords clarify compensation levels for commercial agents

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

News

The question of how a commercial agent should be compensated for the termination of an agency agreement under European law has been settled by the House of Lords.

In Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Ltd the law lords rejected the French approach of automatically awarding two years’ gross commission, ruling that compensation should mirror the market value of the agency business at the date of termination.

Under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, a principal is required to compensate its agent if the agency agreement is terminated. However, the way compensation is calculated has until now been unclear.

Peter Ellis, partner at Browne Jacobson, says the Lonsdale case makes clear the approach to be taken in valuing compensation, but parties in this type of case may still be concerned by the cost of expert evidence to value the business.

“Often agencies are simply too small to warrant the cost of an accountancy expert. The House of Lords suggests that it should be possible for the court to have regard to the ‘going rate’ for buying and selling comparable businesses but to give greater certainty, one option might be to include a valuation clause in the agency agreement setting out the basis for the valuation on termination.”

Lord Hoffmann rejected the appellant’s request for a reference to the European Court of Justice, holding that the method for the calculation of compensation is a discretionary matter for the domestic laws of member states.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll