header-logo header-logo

Law firms still unprepared for artificial intelligence

12 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Artificial intelligence , Career focus
printer mail-detail
Law firms and legal departments may need to do more to bring their workforce up to speed on artificial intelligence (AI), according to the Future Lawyers Report 2025, published last week.

While 53% of early-career lawyers polled say they feel prepared for the changes brought about by AI, 47% still aren’t prepared for this ‘uncharted territory’ or are unsure how AI will affect them, saying they ‘haven’t been given sufficient training’. The report urges employers to ‘help junior lawyers develop the skills they will need in the future’. 

The report by alternative legal services provider Flex Legal gauges the career hopes, values, concerns and frustrations of trainees, paralegals and junior lawyers up to three years’ PQE.

Mary Bonsor, founder of Flex Legal, said: ‘This is the fourth annual edition of the report. We’ve seen new themes emerge, some come and go and others remain stubbornly constant.’

View a full copy of the report here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll