header-logo header-logo

Law firms missing out on full expensing policy

04 April 2023
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Law firms are likely to miss out on an investment incentive scheme that began this month, unless the government takes action.

The full expensing policy, announced in the Chancellor’s budget and due to run from April 2023 to March 2026, enables businesses to claim 100% capital allowances on investment in plant and machinery in the same tax year.

However, Law Society president Lubna Shuja warned: ‘Many law firms operate under the partnership model and as such partners are taxed individually.

‘This means they do not pay corporation tax and so cannot access the scheme. This creates an odd situation where an insurance company could invest in IT and receive the allowance, but a law firm next door would be unable to.’

Shuja called on the government to extend full expensing to cover law firms.

Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll