header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Law firms among the best

Firms feature prominently in Sunday Times employer list

Law firms have secured a respectable 11 places in the Sunday Times Top 100 Best Companies to Work For.

The prestigious list is compiled annually from employee responses to a questionnaire covering their firm’s leadership, teamwork, work/life balance, pay and benefits, training and career development and social responsibility. Some 383 organisations registered to take part in this year’s survey.

Manchester firm Pannone came in third, up two places on last year. Managing partner Steven Grant says: “In these troubled economic times when there is so much gloom and despondency around, it is great to be able to report some good news.

“To be listed in the top 100 is an achievement in itself, but to reach the number three spot is excellent. This is the sixth consecutive year we have finished in the top 10, and third, a position we also reached in 2007, is our highest ever position.”

Three law firms entered the list’s rankings for the first time—Lewis Silkin at 19; CMS Cameron Mckenna at 74; and Charles Russell at 92. Charles Russell was praised for its pro-bono work, which included helping British yachtswomen Helena Lucas get to the Beijing Paralympics. Some 80% of staff say they are proud to be part of the organisation.

Partner James Holder, says: “We had some very positive scores from staff and it’s great to receive recognition for probono projects.”

Other law firms featured in the list were: Brabners Chaffe Street at 20 (up from 27 last year); Olswang at 58 (up from 95); Mishcon de Reya at 69 (down from 65); Freeth Cartwright at 72 (up from 90); Mills & Reeve at 83 (down from 68); Practical Law Company at 87 (up from 91); and Berwin Leighton Paisner at 94 (down from 74).

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll