header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 9 May 2025

09 May 2025
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Appeal

R v Perry [2025] UKSC 17

This is an appeal to the Supreme Court in a criminal case from Northern Ireland. The certified question is whether the interpretation of a defence statement is a question of law for the trial judge. That would depend on the nature of the statement made in the defence statement and the purpose for which it is being relied upon. The key legal finding is that the interpretation of a paragraph in the appellant's defence statement raises a question of fact, not law, for the trial judge. The concurrent factual findings of the trial judge and Court of Appeal that the appellant lacked credibility should not be disturbed absent a misdirection or perverse conclusion.


Barrister

Taylor v The Bar Standards Board [2025] EWHC 1029 (Admin)

The Administrative Court allowed the appellant barrister’s statutory appeal pursuant to s 24 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 against a sanction imposed by a disciplinary panel of the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service. The appellant barrister

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll