header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 7 November 2025

07 November 2025
Issue: 8138 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Elections

Moore v Royal Mail Group Ltd and others [2025] EWCA Civ 1378

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed an appeal against the Divisional Court’s refusal to dismiss an election petition. What is at issue is whether an election petition presented by the respondent Mr Graham Moore should be dismissed because it failed to give information required by the Election Petition Rules 1960 (the 1960 Rules) and/or was not duly served. The Divisional Court concluded that the trial of the petition should proceed. That decision is challenged by the appellants Ms Sarah Pochin (the candidate declared to have been elected) and Mr Stephen Young (the returning officer). While the court found that a petition should state the date of return to the Clerk of the Crown (answering the first issue affirmatively), it held that Parliament did not intend this omission to invalidate the petition in these circumstances where no prejudice had occurred. The court also held that CPR 6.15(2) empowers courts to retrospectively validate steps taken to serve an election petition within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll