header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 4 April 2025

04 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Commission

Expert Tooling and Automation Ltd v Engie Power Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 292

This was an appeal before the Court of Appeal, Civil Division. This case concerns the liability of someone who pays commission to the agent of a third-party principal, where the circumstances of the commission are only partially disclosed to the principal (sometimes referred to as a ‘half-secret’ commission case). The claimant (Tooling) is a company carrying on business as a manufacturer of tools and related equipment and machinery. The defendant, (Engie), supplies electricity. Tooling used the services of a third-party broker (UW). Five contracts are at issue, all for the supply of electricity to Tooling’s premise. The key legal findings were: UW, the broker, owed fiduciary duties to Tooling, including a duty not to put itself in a position of conflict of interest without Tooling’s informed consent; merely disclosing the fact that commission would be paid was insufficient to obtain Tooling’s informed consent, where material details about the amount and funding of the commission were not disclosed; and Engie’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll