header-logo header-logo

04 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 4 April 2025

Commission

Expert Tooling and Automation Ltd v Engie Power Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 292

This was an appeal before the Court of Appeal, Civil Division. This case concerns the liability of someone who pays commission to the agent of a third-party principal, where the circumstances of the commission are only partially disclosed to the principal (sometimes referred to as a ‘half-secret’ commission case). The claimant (Tooling) is a company carrying on business as a manufacturer of tools and related equipment and machinery. The defendant, (Engie), supplies electricity. Tooling used the services of a third-party broker (UW). Five contracts are at issue, all for the supply of electricity to Tooling’s premise. The key legal findings were: UW, the broker, owed fiduciary duties to Tooling, including a duty not to put itself in a position of conflict of interest without Tooling’s informed consent; merely disclosing the fact that commission would be paid was insufficient to obtain Tooling’s informed consent, where material details about the amount and funding of the commission were not disclosed;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll