header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 3 October 2025

03 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd and another company [2025] EWCA Civ 1206

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal brought by the claimant against a judgment by the High Court relating to breaches of a shareholders’ agreement (SHA). The court determined that breaches of SHA clauses by one party could be deemed ‘capable of remedy’ depending on whether the situation could be corrected practically without ongoing prejudice for the future. The judgment critically examined whether persistent breaches were remediable within the ten-business-day period specified by the SHA, as well as whether repudiatory breaches were necessarily incapable of remedy. Ultimately, the court held that it was not apparent that the buyback was not capable of being achieved in ten days. The court concluded that deliberate conduct, seriousness of breaches, and motive may influence remediability, but do not automatically render breaches irremediable unless significant lasting damage is caused.


Costs

Smith v Rice [2025] EWHC 2426 (Comm)

The Commercial Court ruled on certain matters regarding the amount of judgment and associated costs following

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll