header-logo header-logo

21 November 2025
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 21 November 2025

Costs

Dover Farm Developments Ltd v Lucas and others [2025] EWHC 2862 (KB)

The King’s Bench Division ruled on costs following a hearing where both parties’ applications were unsuccessful. The defendants’ strike-out application was dismissed, and the claimants’ application to amend their particulars of claim was refused because they had not provided a proper draft of the amendments. The claim was subsequently stayed and the parties engaged in a successful court-mediated settlement, with only the costs of the hearing remaining unresolved. Applying CPR 44.2, the court determined that while the general rule would make the defendants liable for the costs of the strike-out application and the claimants liable for the costs of the amendment application, several factors warranted consideration, including that both applications were heard together, the defendants later consented to amended particulars, and the hearing facilitated the eventual mediation. The court assessed the claimants’ recoverable costs at £4,597.44 and the defendants’ costs at £493.32, resulting in a net payment of £4,104.12 due from the defendants to the claimants.


Family proceedings

R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll